Issue 42
Notebook

Beyond National Memory: Multilingual Witnessing and Transnational Comfort Women Survivorship in '63 Years On'

Sen Ni
Seoul National University
Bio

Published 2026-07-31

Keywords

  • Comfort Women,
  • 63 Years On,
  • Embodied memory,
  • Documentary,
  • Transnational witnessing

How to Cite

Ni, S. (2026). Beyond National Memory: Multilingual Witnessing and Transnational Comfort Women Survivorship in ’63 Years On’. L’Atalante. Journal of Film Studies, (42), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.63700/1386

Abstract

This paper examines how 63 Years On (Kim Dong-won, 2008) reconfigures the history of the Japanese military “comfort women” system through a transnational mode of witnessing. Instead of organising testimonies within national boundaries, the film brings women from Korea, China, the Philippines and the Dutch East Indies into a shared cinematic space. Their memories—spoken in different languages yet shaped by similar ruptures of childhood, community and bodily integrity—form a network of resonance that reveals the regional structure of wartime violence. The film achieves this through a network of practices that include a translingual model of testimony, whereby suffering can be articulated across linguistic difference; a bodily semiotics of the women’s facial expressions and gestures, of halting body movements and of restrained weeping that is readable across cultural difference; and finally, a mode of camera ethics that places each woman’s testimony on an equal footing with the others that is maintained through careful staging, measured distancing and a horizontal montage. Each of these practices creates a space of cross-cultural dialogue that is unreadable through any of these methods independently. It is thus argued that 63 Years On not only documents traumatic experiences but proposes a trans-Asian ethics of remembering, where survivorship emerges as a shared historical claim grounded in interconnected experiences of violence and the collective pursuit of justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ahn, Y. (2015). Together and Apart: Transnational Women’s Activism in the “Comfort Women” Campaign in South Korea and Japan. Comparative Korean Studies, 23(1), 39–62. https://dx.doi.org/10.19115/CKS.23.1.2
  2. Azoulay, A. (2021). The Civil Contract of Photography. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  3. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
  4. Chen, N. N., & Minh-Ha, T. T. (2014). Speaking Nearby. In Visualizing Theory (pp. 433–453). Abingdon: Routledge.
  5. Cui, S. (2003). Women through the Lens: Gender and Nation in a Century of Chinese Cinema. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
  6. Erll, A. (2011). Travelling Memory. Parallax, 17(4), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605570
  7. Erll, A., & Nünning, A. (Eds.). (2008). Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, De Gruyter.
  8. Hartman, S. (2007). Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  9. Herr, R. S. (2016). Can Transnational Feminist Solidarity Accommodate Nationalism? Reflections from the Case Study of Korean “Comfort Women”. Hypatia, 31(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12213
  10. Kim, C. J. (2022). Transnational Advocacy, Norm Regress, and Foreign Compliance Constituencies: The Case of the “Comfort Women” Redress Movement. International Studies Quarterly, 66(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqac059
  11. Kim, H. G. (2025). The Archival Practice of “Comfort Women” Documentary Shusenjo: The Main Battleground of the Comfort Women Issue. Women’s History Review, 34(5), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2025.2496093
  12. Kim, J. (2020). Going Transnational? A Feminist View of “Comfort Women” Memorials. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 26(3), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2020.1808287
  13. Ku, Y. (2015). National Interest or Transnational Alliances? Japanese Policy on the Comfort Women Issue. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(2), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S159824080000936X
  14. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, Duke University Press.
  15. Nadesan, M., & Kim, L. (2022). The Geopolitics of Public Memory: The Challenge and Promise of Transnational Comfort Women Activism. Women’s Studies in Communication, 45(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2021.1954119
  16. Lee Seung-gu (Producer), & Kim, D.-w. (Director). (2008). 63 Years On. South Korea: Dreamville Entertainment.
  17. Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  18. Shin, H. (2021). Voices of the “Comfort Women”: The Power Politics Surrounding the UNESCO Documentary Heritage. Asia-Pacific Journal, 19(5), Article e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1557466021037992
  19. Soh, C. S. (2008). The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Thoma, P. (2000). Cultural Autobiography, Testimonial, and Asian American Transnational Feminist Coalition in the “Comfort Women of World War II” Conference. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 21(1/2), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3347030
  21. Yoneyama, L. (2016). Cold War Ruins: Transpacific Critique of American Justice and Japanese War Crimes. Durham, Duke University Press.